Research Engineer/Research Scientist - Red Team (Misuse)

AI Safety Institute
London, United Kingdom
2 weeks ago
Posted
1 Apr 2026 (2 weeks ago)

About the AI Security Institute

The AI Security Institute is the world's largest and best-funded team dedicated to understanding advanced AI risks and translating that knowledge into action. We’re in the heart of the UK government with direct lines to No. 10 (the Prime Minister's office), and we work with frontier developers and governments globally.

We’re here because governments are critical for advanced AI going well, and UK AISI is uniquely positioned to mobilise them. With our resources, unique agility and international influence, this is the best place to shape both AI development and government action.

The deadline for applying to this role is Tuesday 7th April 2026, end of day, anywhere on Earth.

Team Description

Interventions that secure a system from abuse by bad actors or misaligned AI systems will grow in importance as AI systems become more capable, autonomous, and integrated into society.

The Misuse Red Team is a specialised subteam within AISI's wider Red Team. We red-team frontier AI safeguards for dangerous capabilities, research novel attack vectors, and develop advanced automated attack tooling. We share our findings with frontier AI companies (including Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepMind), key UK officials, and other governments to inform their respective deployment, research, and policy decision-making.

We have published on several topics, including novel automated attack algorithms (Boundary Point Jailbreaking), poisoning attacks, safeguards safety cases, defending finetuning APIs, third-party attacks on agents, agent misuse, and pre-training data filtering. Some example impact cases have been advancing the benchmarking of agent misuse, identifying novel vulnerabilities and collaborating with frontier labs to mitigate them, and producing insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of attacks and defences in data poisoning and fine-tuning APIs.

Role Description

We’re looking for research scientists and research engineers for our misuse sub-team with expertise developing and analysing attacks and protections for systems based on large language models or who have broader experience with frontier LLM research and development. An ideal candidate would have a strong track record of performing and publishing novel and impactful research in these or other areas of LLM research. We’re looking for:

  • Research Scientists, who typically leadtechnical direction– picking the questions, designing the experiments, and owning the conclusions (typically evidenced by a strong publication record).
  • Research Engineers, who typically leadexecution – building the systems and code that make those experiments possible at scale, and owning reliability, speed, and reproducibility.

In practice, we can support staff’s work spanning or alternating between research and engineering.If you have a preference, please specify this in your application.

The team is currently led by Eric Winsor and Xander Davies – advised by Geoffrey Irving and Yarin Gal. You’ll work with incredible technical staff across AISI, including alumni from Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepMind, and top universities. You may also collaborate with external teams from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Gray Swan.

We are open to hires at junior, senior, staff and principal research scientist levels.

Representative projects you might work on

  • Designing, building, running and evaluating methods to automatically attack and evaluate safeguards, such as LLM-automated attacking and direct optimisation approaches.
  • Building a benchmark for asynchronous monitoring for signs of misuse and jailbreak development across multiple model interactions.
  • Investigating novel attacks and defences for data poisoning LLMs with backdoors or other attacker goals.
  • Performing adversarial testing of frontier AI system safeguards and producing reports that are impactful and action-guiding for safeguard developers.

What we’re looking for

In accordance with the Civil Service Commission rules, the following list contains all selection criteria for the interview process.

The experiences listed below should be interpreted as examples of the expertise we're looking for, as opposed to a list of everything we expect to find in one applicant:

You may be a good fit if you have:

  • Hands-on research experience with large language models (LLMs) - such as training, fine-tuning, evaluation, or safety research.
  • A demonstrated track record of peer-reviewed publications in top-tier ML conferences or journals.
  • Ability and experience writing clean, documented research code for machine learning experiments, including experience with ML frameworks like PyTorch or evaluation frameworks like Inspect.
  • A sense of mission, urgency, responsibility for success.
  • An ability to bring your own research ideas and work in a self-directed way, while also collaborating effectively and prioritizing team efforts over extensive solo work.

Strong candidates may also have:

  • Experience working on adversarial robustness, other areas of AI security, or red teaming against any kind of system.
  • Experience working on AI alignment or AI control.

    Related Jobs

    View all jobs

    (Alignment) Research Engineer/Research Scientist - Red Team

    AI Safety Institute London, United Kingdom

    Research Engineer - Societal Impacts

    AI Safety Institute London, United Kingdom

    ML Research Engineer, London

    Isomorphic Labs London, United Kingdom

    Research Engineer

    Relation Therapeutics London, United Kingdom
    Permanent

    Principal Machine Learning Infrastructure Engineer

    PhysicsX London, United Kingdom

    Forward Deployed AI Engineer

    Latent Labs London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Hybrid

    Subscribe to Future Tech Insights for the latest jobs & insights, direct to your inbox.

    By subscribing, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.

    Industry Insights

    Discover insightful articles, industry insights, expert tips, and curated resources.

    Where to Advertise AI Jobs in the UK (2026 Guide)

    Advertising AI jobs in the UK requires a different approach to most technical hiring. The candidate pool is small, highly informed and in demand across multiple sectors simultaneously. General job boards reach a broad audience but lack the specificity that AI professionals expect — and the filtering mechanisms they rely on. Specialist platforms, direct outreach and academic channels each serve a different part of the market. This guide, published by ArtificialIntelligenceJobs.co.uk, covers where to advertise AI roles in the UK in 2026, how the main platforms compare, what employers should expect to pay, and what the data says about time-to-hire across different role types.

    New AI Employers to Watch in 2026: UK and Global Companies Reshaping AI Careers

    The artificial intelligence job market in the UK is evolving at an extraordinary pace. With record-breaking investment, government backing, and a surge in enterprise adoption, the landscape of AI employers is shifting rapidly. For candidates exploring opportunities on ArtificialIntelligenceJobs.co.uk, understanding who is hiring next is just as important as understanding what skills are in demand. In this article, we explore the new and emerging AI employers to watch in 2026, focusing on organisations that have recently secured funding, won major contracts, or expanded their UK footprint. From cutting-edge startups to global giants doubling down on Britain, these companies represent the next wave of AI career opportunities.

    How Many AI Tools Do You Need to Know to Get an AI Job?

    If you are job hunting in AI right now it can feel like you are drowning in tools. Every week there is a new framework, a new “must-learn” platform or a new productivity app that everyone on LinkedIn seems to be using. The result is predictable: job seekers panic-learn a long list of tools without actually getting better at delivering outcomes. Here is the truth most hiring managers will quietly agree with. They do not hire you because you know 27 tools. They hire you because you can solve a problem, communicate trade-offs, ship something reliable and improve it with feedback. Tools matter, but only in service of outcomes. So how many AI tools do you actually need to know? For most AI job seekers: fewer than you think. You need a tight core toolkit plus a role-specific layer. Everything else is optional. This guide breaks it down clearly, gives you a simple framework to choose what to learn and shows you how to present your toolset on your CV, portfolio and interviews.